Starting an Engineering Department?

spart S

Being an engineer I have always been intrigued with peoples’ perception of engineering and what engineers do. I have witnessed customers who thought they needed engineering and technical documentation services and that lead to hiring a person they thought would fill the void. At the start that person does fill the void and more. This person not only solves the immediate problems but opens a window of potential to answer larger challenges. Very quickly that person has a list of things to-do a mile long and their responsibilities range from drafting to technical analysis. Logical thought leads to the idea that more is better so naturally more people are hired to help the first. But with more people efficiency begins to slip and the real problems start to surface. The first person may not be a leader of people and tasks will begin to overlap and work is duplicated or lost. Skill sets are different and the finish item are inconsistent. Weaknesses in the infrastructure also become apparent: Software is inadequate, hardware doesn’t match the software, office space is short, internet is slow, etc. An honest attempt to add value turns into a full blown venture with a high level of risk.

Generally a company that is looking to add engineering services to their list of services has achieved a certain level of success. Their current system has lead them to a comfortable level of profitability and they are looking for the next level. Specifically manufacturing, machine shops and fabricators look to engineering as the way to achieve that next level in their business. Unfortunately the systems that have made them successful to this point was never designed for engineering work. Why is it that most of these companies would never think of adding a full time accountant or a lawyer to their business? They are happy to keep these services at arm’s length and use on an as needed basis. It may be that manufacturers, machine shops and fabricators feel they have a better connection with what a engineers do. They may feel that it is an easy addition to what they already to do.

The truth is that engineering can be a very valuable addition to any company if it is handled properly. Engineering like any other business needs structure and a system to operate within. Students fresh from colleges and universities are not taught structure or systems and experienced engineers will have paradigms about a system that should be used. But often this systems lacks in the economic metrics to measure profitability and the structure is an afterthought.

If you are thinking about adding a engineering component to your business you should be able to answer these question prior to hiring anyone:

Do we need a CET, EIT or P.Eng? What are the differences between them? What are the liabilities associated with all three? How will my insurance be affected with each?

How does engineering fit in our corporate structure? Who will manage engineering? What will the responsibilities of engineering be?

Does we have a system for engineers to operate under? Do we have the structure to support engineering?

Do I have a system to measure performance and ultimately profitability of my engineering division?
The reality is that engineering and technical documentation services is a business. These services have enough layers of complexity that efficiencies are tough to find. Without efficient and well organized work the product will be incomplete and inconsistent. In the next series of articles I will try to demystify engineering services and layout the foundation for adding engineering to your business.

At Sparta we are committed to “Designing Solutions” and we supply much more that just engineering. We offer a partnership with existing businesses who are looking to add engineering. We provide a template of how to integrate engineering services into your business and guarantee its success. Our system can be a real solution to higher productivity, greater efficiency, better communication all at a lower cost.

High Tensile Steel in Design

spart S

Designing with High Tensile Steel:

The majority of the design work Sparta does revolves around mobile equipment that is subject to strict weight limits due to road regulations. We are finding that our customers are demanding a more sophisticated product and asking us to make things stronger, lighter and of course cheaper. This is no easy task as there is a strong correlation between weight and cost in steel structures, as weight goes down cost generally goes up. However, one of the strategies we use to push our designs and meet these parameters is through the use of high tensile steel such as QT-100. Sparta has had a lot of success with this strategy and have employed it in many of our projects.

QT-100:

QT-100 is a grade of steel where the QT simply means quenched and tempered and the “100″ means 100,000 psi yield. QT-100 is the common name for this product but is also marketed under many other names such as T-1 or A514. The steel gains its characteristics from the process of quenching and tempering. This is a process steel suppliers will use to control grain structure of steel by heating the steel up to a specific temperature and controlling the rate of cooling in order to improve certain qualities(read more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_treating ). The resulting steel has improved strength and flexibility while still maintaining weld-ability. These characteristics have made it a fantastic tool for an engineer designing high performance equipment.

The Economics of High Tensile Steel

The economics of using high tensile steel in design are an interesting look at how engineers can add value to a project. QT-100 delivers a yield of 100,000psi which is approximately 2-3 times as strong as standard steel which ranges from 36,000psi for non structural to 50,000psi for structural grades. Using high tensile steel with this increased yield strength allows engineers to use steel that is ½ to 1/3 the thickness and weight to do same job. This by itself would be great, by switching to high tensile steel you have substantially reduced the weight of your product. In the transportation world less dead weight means more payload, more equipment and few truck loads for the customer all of which drive profit for the end user. The compounding effect of this is: at the time of writing mild steel with a 44,000psi yield costs about $52/CWT and QT100 is around $76/CWT.  So the high tensile steel is 50% more expensive but you can achieve the same strength using less than half the material. The end result is a product that is significantly lighter and even slightly cheaper.

Deflection and High Tensile Steels:

There are a few situations where having a high tensile steel doesn’t help at all. One of these are in cases where the design is dictated by deflection rather then yield. High tensile steel is able to deflect more then mild steel before breaking but both materials deflect the same amount with respect to a given load. In many building codes and crane applications deflection is the primary mode of failure. A common rule of thumb is  the allowable deflection in a steel structure is 1/300th or 1/600th the length in deflection. So a 600″ beam is allowed to deflect a maximum of 1″. When designing with these parameters the structure fails it’s deflection parameters long before it is close to yielding so a material with a higher yield but the same deflection is pointless. For instance you could build a walkway that was super light and made from high tensile steel but it would feel uncomfortable walking on it because it would be spongy. In another scenario, gantry style cranes are made from regular structural steel because you have to build them heavy enough that they don’t deflect to the point where it wont roll down the tracks anymore.

Other Forms of High Tensile Steel:

There are many other forms of high tensile steel often found in bar stock that has 100,000psi yield or even higher but this is achieved by adjusting the material composition. For instance 4140 is a high tensile steel bar stock with an increased carbon content but the increased yield comes at the expense of ductility and weld-ability.

High Tensile Design in Action

A good example of the application of these principles are with Sparta’s mast design. Traditional service rig masts are built by welding many 50,000 psi yield tubing in a criss-cross pattern up the length of the mast. In order to decrease weight and cost Sparta approached this problem a little differently then most companies. Using a mixture of high tensile plate and tubing to replace the traditional system Sparta was able to produce a fantastic product that is light, strong and easy to build.

P1 DOUBLE GEN 2 FIRST MAST RAISE 042

Engineers in Demand

Enterprising firms delivering competitive advantages to manufacturers

 

spart S

Their upstart firm, Sparta Engineering,
now provides manufacturing
firms with all the benefits
of an in-house engineering
department – such as having an
engineer on the shop floor, where
the manufacturing happens – at a
significantly lower cost.

“We offer a legal partnership
that provides manufacturers with
profit-sharing opportunities,”
explains Mr. Fox, noting that Linden,
Alta.-based Sparta now has
offices in Grande Prairie, in northwest
Alberta, as well as in Mexico.
“They then have in-house engineering
that is instantly scalable,
through our other divisions.”

Read the whole article published in the Globe and Mail on March 27th here:

 

E-Enigneers in Demand May 27.13